When you fall to the tertiary level of non violent, non aggressive considerations however, the moral implication of good versus bad mingles inevitably with ideology and … Thus, secondary cases can be judged too : non lethal violence, refusal to communicate to avoid conflict and so on. After this primary level, all other cases of good and bad derive from the exact same reasoning.
When you need not take life however, then you enter the realm of evil, of bad actions. This is merely a natural occurrence of self-defense. If you want to tag a lion killing a gazelle as bad, then by the same logic so are poisonous frogs or mushrooms even though the death they bring is only activated by the animal trying to eat them? Which makes no sense. Basically, moral sense refers to necessity.Ī predator that kills to feed is not doing anything bad, on the contrary, it uses its natural means to further the cycle of life of which it is but a gear, a cog. That one alone is already hard to circumscribe since ideology is easily added to it. The moral ones are different as they vary considerably in scope, the simplest concerning good vs evil. Boobs or dicks, black or white skin or any color in between are inherited and just as money in the same case prove nothing about the worth of the individual that possess them.They are not earned. I have a very good and quite simple reason not to accept to delve in these : I don’t believe there is any credit to be had for things you got without asking or working for them. believing that your category is more proper than the rest. But of course, the opposition is borne out of narcissistic tendencies, i.e. They all rely on a dichotomy : my sex versus the other, my color vs the others and so on. The factual or natural ones are not that serious unless you cannot grow to consider beings outside yourself. There are three sources to seeing others are diametrically different from oneself : May the reader pardon then the title as paraphrasing the 7 degrees of separation and proceed with matter over form in studying this text. Castes in India or tribal warfare and the likes are very much segregation resulting from prejudice even as applied by individuals and not code of law, which itself is only instated because such beliefs require it. However, both lead to segregation in any case even if not legally as those that find enough basis to judge others as too different for comfort end up practicing segregation in one way or another, avoiding those they deem imperfect.
Discrimination would have been a better fit or prejudice.
0 kommentar(er)
